Transparabl helps European businesses identify, measure, and eliminate the biggest cost drivers in their operations — energy, water, waste, procurement, and supply chain — while building the CSRD-ready documentation that wins tenders and satisfies investors.
8%
Average operational cost reduction across clients
Phase 1–5
Structured methodology from baseline to net-zero
100%
CSRD & GHG Protocol aligned savings documentation
6 sectors
Proven approach across European industries
We don't just track emissions — we use sustainability data as a lens to find and eliminate cost waste across your operations. Each phase delivers measurable value before moving to the next.
Every industry has unique cost structures and sustainability pressure points. Here's exactly how Transparabl delivers savings in each sector.
The Challenge
Thin margins, fragmented procurement, CO₂ per project tracking, supplier data gaps, and growing tender requirements for climate documentation.
Our Approach
Typical Outcome
Typical clients identify 5–12% procurement cost savings in Phase 2–3, with improved tender win rates from verifiable climate documentation.
The Challenge
High energy and utility costs across multi-property portfolios, ESG investor pressure, fragmented supplier base, and building-level performance gaps.
Our Approach
Typical Outcome
Real estate clients typically reduce utility and facility management costs by 8–15% through systematic monitoring and supplier consolidation.
The Challenge
Fuel costs represent the largest operational expense, margins are unpredictable, and customers increasingly require verifiable emissions documentation.
Our Approach
Typical Outcome
Logistics clients typically identify 6–10% fuel cost reduction opportunities through route and fleet optimisation insights.
The Challenge
High operating costs, strict emissions requirements in public contracts, complex waste stream documentation, and limited visibility into cost drivers.
Our Approach
Typical Outcome
Waste sector clients identify 5–9% operational cost savings through route optimisation and waste diversion analytics.
The Challenge
Energy costs are a major margin lever, Scope 3 value chain emissions are difficult to track, and supply chain transparency is increasingly demanded by customers.
Our Approach
Typical Outcome
Industrial clients typically identify 8–14% energy cost savings through process mapping and continuous monitoring.
The Challenge
Price pressure from larger competitors, weak sustainability documentation, unstructured project economics, and growing customer demand for climate credentials.
Our Approach
Typical Outcome
Technical contractors see improved tender success rates and are able to justify higher contract values through verified sustainability documentation.
We start with your actual cost structure — energy bills, procurement spend, fuel costs — and build a savings plan from measured data, not assumptions.
Savings are documented with timestamps, evidence uploads and user attribution — so every cost reduction is also verifiable for CSRD and bank/investor reporting.
Monthly performance packs and Power BI dashboards let you track savings in real time — not just at year-end when it's too late to course-correct.
Auto-generate climate documentation for public and private sector tenders — including CO₂ per project, supplier engagement records, and CSRD disclosures.
All cost reductions are simultaneously logged as Scope 1, 2 or 3 emissions reductions — one dataset, two outcomes: savings and compliance.
Phase 5 builds your decarbonisation roadmap ranked by ROI — so every investment in sustainability is evaluated on financial return, not just emissions impact.
Book a discovery call. We'll show you exactly where you can cut costs, reduce emissions, and build CSRD-ready documentation — without the chaos.